Project Runway - Week 3 - Iconic Inspirations
comments (18) January 29th, 2010 in designThis was a jam packed week on Project Runway! First, the designers were taken to the Metropolitan Museum of Art where they were given a private showing of ten iconic costumes from the curatorial department of the Costume Institute—shown in sky lit daylight. At a glance, I recognized ensembles that live in my heart from well worn pages of design books from the likes of Chanel, Vionnet, Yves Saint Laurent, Christian Dior, and Madame Gres. What a thrilling opportunity for the designers to see pieces of this quality under such ideal conditions. The designers were then divided into teams of two, given a $500 budget, and two days to design a high-end signature look based on their personal style as designers. Sometime later they were given a second challenge to design a “look for less” garment inspired by one of the signature garments designed by another team—within a $50 budget.
Ping and Jesse could have won the award for the most difficult team. Jesse knew from the onset that he didn’t want to work with Ping, and we could all have guessed that she would be a challenge of her own to work with. In the end, Ping was eliminated this week. I don’t see how any of us can be surprised, but she does have a certain unique style. She was wearing a very interesting pair of glasses this week.
Looking back over the 14 garments we were shown, only two of them weren’t predominantly black or dark colors. This makes for a grim runway show in my book, and makes it hard to see the detail in the clothes. Once again, I think a couple of the best designs were hidden in the “safe” bunch. Jesus and Amy’s signature gown was stunning from all angles. Their look for less derivation of Ping’s signature style was a unique interpretation. Jay and Maya were my choice to win. Mila won this week, and I’m going to admit here for all to read, I think this garment looks like a Target commercial. The jacket is an old fashioned cocoon coat silhouette, and the stripes down the pant legs looked like exercise pants. All four judges praised this ensemble—maybe that’s my signal to keep my day job. One thing for sure, it continues to be a great season so far. What were your favorites?
Anthony Williams & Seth Aaron Henderson


Anna Marie Lynett & Emilio Sosa


Janeane Marie Ceccanti & Ben Chmura


for the latest tips and sewing advice.
Sewing Products
-
Singer 3 Prong Foot Control ...
-
Gingher G-4C 4 inch Curved Embroidery...
-
RC100 Technix Stand Up Rotary Cutter...
-
Bernina Artista Format, 10 Flowers...
-
LauraStar Steam Iron Aqua Pre Filter...
-
Consew 745R-30P Extra Heavy Duty...
-
Organ 175x7 PD Titanium Coated Stub...
-
Brother SA322 No. 22 Quilted and...
-
Yamata YCM-050 Replacement Circular...
-
Bias Binder Attachment 3/4" Mouth...
-
Brother SA355 No.55 Gardening...
-
Jiasew Gemsy G2100A-04 4 Thread...
See More Products

















Comments (18)
Carol
Henderson, NV
Posted: 9:06 pm on February 3rd
I'm sorry, I probably was bad and spoke too soon of this design. Everyone knows penguins live in the SOUTH POLE!
>:-)
Posted: 1:31 pm on February 2nd
Posted: 12:08 pm on February 2nd
Posted: 12:59 am on February 2nd
Posted: 12:59 am on February 2nd
Posted: 12:59 am on February 2nd
Posted: 12:58 am on February 2nd
Posted: 9:30 pm on February 1st
Posted: 9:07 pm on February 1st
Just maybe there should be a weekly fourth guest judge. Someone who is not a celebrity but likes to sew. Sometimes I think the judges are so jaded that they choose all kinds of "stuff" as winner. Do you really think the maternity top Heidi has on (Models of the Runway) is really cute? What was she thinking? I'm not being catty or mean, but it seems as if she did not feel well that day to wear that!
I really do like this forum. Oh, I think Jesus and Amy or Jay and Maya should have won.
Posted: 8:53 pm on February 1st
I was surprised that last week Ping was kept. I don't think the designer should be kept when they send their model out with her rear hanging out!
I liked Jesus and Amy's dress; although, it appears to be a bit copied from other designs I have seen designers produce. It was elegant!
Posted: 6:20 pm on February 1st
Loved Anna's and Emillo's first look.
Posted: 6:15 pm on February 1st
This week I was more sorry than ever that Pamela Ptak was gone. She would have been MARVELOUS in this challenge! With her couture skills and deep knowledge of fashion history, plus her positive, can-do attitude, I think she'd have blown us and the judges away--and treated her partner well at the same time.
I kind of hated to see Ping leave, although I haven't liked her designs after week one. She's entertaining and seems driven by genuine creativity, rather than ego. I guess Anthony is going to be our diva for as long as he lasts. He does come out with expressions that made me laugh! He said up front that pageant-type design is his ambition, though, so I don't now how long he can last. The judges hate anything that smacks of pageantry.
Posted: 1:46 pm on February 1st
I believe that the darker palette shows the design differences to their best advantage. If you can design something uniquely beautiful in black then you will find a happy client. I personally believe though that in actual life scenarios that flattering the wearer's appearance comes first. Thinking of the place or circumstances of your environment are necessary to achieve this happy harmony, and should be thought of in second place. I admit that I am not sure whom they (the designers) are designing for at the time of the show. Are they merely designing for the judges at this time? Who are the judges designing their critiques for at this time? Creating a fashion show that attracts buyers will involve more than what I have seen. I suppose I shall wait and see how the show rounds out before surrendering my decision on what I consider to be a winning outfit or a winning designer.
Signed,
ExcusiveHerb
Posted: 1:38 pm on February 1st
I believe that the darker palette shows the design differences to their best advantage. If you can design something uniquely beautiful in black then you will find a happy client. I personally believe though that in actually life scenarios that flattering the wearer's appearance comes firstly. Thinking of the place or circumstances of your environment are necessary to achieve this happy harmony, and should be thought of in second place. I admit that I am not sure whom they (the designers) are designing for at the time of the show. Are they merely designing for the judges at this time? Who are the judges designing their critiques for at this time? Creating a fashion show that attracts buyers will involve more than what I have seen. I suppose I shall wait and see how the show rounds out before surrendering my decision on what I consider to be a winning outfit or a winning designer.
Signed,
ExcusiveHerb
Posted: 1:36 pm on February 1st
And thank you, Judith for pointing out how unattractive Mila's design was compared with others. I REALLY disliked the jacket. My daughter thought it looked like bat wings. I think Mila got brownie points because she didn't make a dress for the signature look, but 'separates' as Michael noted. I am not a hugh fan of graphic clothing anyway. It was in no way striking..........which brings me to..........
Jay and Maya's signature look was beautiful. It was a classic, 1930's-type elegant, sleek dress. The one-shoulder and the thinness of the other side as it came down in the side/back, as Nina mentioned, was wonderful to see. Second place for me would have gone to Amy and Jesus. And I agree that not enough time is spent showing the 'safe' designs to the audience. Maybe if they cut out more of the hair/makeup part which I care nothing about for the most part--even though I know it's supposed to complete the 'look' or to put a period on it.
Overall, the episode so lacked color in the designer's looks. Most of the 'inspired' looks were drab and boring and were such a contrast as to how much time was put into making the signature look.
In the end, I agreed that Ping should go (if not before now). Fashion is so subjective. And to consider Nina, Michael and Heidi as experts is in a sense ridiculous. They seem to be right on for the most part regarding obvious misses in a garment. But on the other hand, it's all just opinion and certainly assert theirs in a strong manner, whether right or wrong..........subjectively, of course.
Posted: 7:20 pm on January 31st
Posted: 8:33 am on January 31st
Posted: 2:38 am on January 30th
You must be logged in to post comments. Click here to login.