Mystery Foot Revealed
In September, I sought the assistance of Threads online readers to help figure out the purpose of an old sewing machine foot that I have never been able to use. The foot had been part of my mother's collection of sewing notions that I inherited many years ago. As in most mysteries, a combination of input from many sources led me to the solution.
Many of you thought it was a ruffler. I didn't agree, because I also have an old ruffler. Although they look very similar, when you hold them side-by-side, they are quite different.
Others believed it was a zig-zag foot for an early machine that didn't have zig-zag capability. My mother's machine could only make a straight stitch, so this was a good possibility. But when I tried to use it on my machine, the base of the foot didn't go down far enough to meet the throat plate. (All of my mother's old specialty feet fit perfectly on my machine.) It wasn't until I read the comment from sewnso for about the third time that the light-bulb went on in my head. She said, "I thought I was one of few that had this heavy sewing machine foot..." Although she was incorrect about the use of the foot (she also thought it was a ruffler), her word "heavy" got me thinking. My mother made lots of coats over the years for herself and for my sister and I. I pondered the possibility that perhaps this foot was a specialty foot meant for heavy fabric. I took some heavy double sided fleece and gave it a try. To my surprise, it stitched a beautiful zig-zag stitch. It was interesting to watch, because the needle stitched a straight line, but, as many of you suggested, the foot actually moved the fabric from left to right as it stitched. The button screw at the back of the attachment controlled the width.
I'm thrilled to finally know what this foot is for, but even more importantly, it made me truly appreciate my sewing machine. My machine may not be the newest machine on the market (far from it), but at the touch of a finger, and without special attachments, I can create many different zig-zag and other stitches that my mother and grandmother could only have dreamed about. How fortunate we sewers are in today's world. Not only do we have great machines available to us, but we also have incredible notions to make our sewing easier, quicker and better constructed. Are we lucky, or what??
Thanks to all of you who helped solve this mystery. Watch for another mystery attachment coming soon.
Posted on Oct 15th, 2009 in sewing, tools & supplies, notions, sewing machine



























Comments (20)
Posted: 11:58 pm on November 3rd
Posted: 12:37 pm on October 29th
It didn't work with thin, cotton fabric because the "knob on the bottom of the foot wasn't able to grab the fabric and move the fabric back and forth. If you click on the link to my original blog (The link can be found in the first sentence above--"sewing machine foot"), you can see the knob in the photo of the underside of the foot (you can read the word "PATENT" near the knob).
When I used two layers of heavier fleece fabric, it worked just fine because the thickness of the fabric allowed the knob to grab the fabric to move it. I would never use this foot since my sewing machine does a zig-zag stitch much more easily, but it certainly was interesting to watch.
Posted: 1:55 pm on October 26th
~Tracy
Posted: 11:13 am on October 22nd
Posted: 3:34 pm on October 21st
Posted: 9:53 pm on October 20th
Posted: 1:19 pm on October 20th
Also, for heavy plaids - would it also be good to use for 'matching up'?
I've really enjoyed the comments on this post - wonderful contributions.
Posted: 11:40 am on October 20th
Does anyone out there know what I'm talking about? Some of the things are really odd-looking. I'd love to know more.
Posted: 11:08 am on October 20th
Posted: 10:59 am on October 20th
I'm so curious what your sewingmachine looks like!!Could you please post it on the site?
In the eighties I bought a Pfaff 1229, but about ten years later I thougt I had to change this fabulous tool for a computer sewing machine. How sorry I soon was! I missed the simple turning and pressing of buttons, and I stopped sewing altogether. A few years ago I bought back a Pfaff 1229. It looked used, and not quite so well looked after like I'm sure my own machine would have looked like if I had kept it...
But I was happy to find the old Pfaff back -which is very rare- and I'm a happy sewer again.
Conclusion: DO NOT EVER SWAP YOUR OLD GOOD SEWING FRIEND FOR A DAZZLING LOOKING YOUNGER ONE!
Posted: 5:27 am on October 20th
It is not only for use on heavy fabrics, although it is wonderful for that. It is also useful for matching plaids and for stitching slippery fabrics as it stops the top piece of material from sliding over the bottom one.
I remember that my mum used it a lot and it was her solution to all difficult fabrics that used to make her curse...
Posted: 1:19 am on October 20th
Shelly
Posted: 12:30 am on October 20th
thanks you for any help
dee
Posted: 8:21 pm on October 19th
Posted: 8:19 pm on October 19th
Posted: 8:01 pm on October 19th
Posted: 7:55 pm on October 19th
I'm pretty sure that this foot is missing a piece. My buttonholder has a plate that screws OVER the throat plate of the machine, so that it can swing the fabric back and forth freely. The feed dogs on the older machines didn't go down, so they had to be covered.
I think your mystery foot IS a regular zigzagger, as some of us suggested, but I do believe its missing a piece which would make it work on regular weight fabrics.
If you read my second post on the original question, you see this...
There probably should be a plate that goes under it that has a wide opening for the zigzag stitch, but which also covers the feed dogs.
In any case, if you are trying it on another machine, you should drop your feed dogs, as I'm pretty sure this foot will push the fabric from side to side as it works and you shouldn't hold onto the fabric while its working.
If you can find a throat plate for a buttonholer, it will probably work the same with this foot.
Emmy
Posted: 7:48 pm on October 19th
However, despite the "touch of a button" magic of modern machines you speak of, I don't use the vast majority of fancy features on my newer machine. And in fact, for the wool flannel pants I'm sewing on now, I'm using my only other sewing machine - a 1950 Singer Centennial 201-2 (a cast iron straight stitch machine) - including the buttonhole attachment, a large "monster" to be sure - but it makes the best buttonholes I've ever seen on a home machine!
So I say, sometimes older and "simpler" can be better! ;-)
Posted: 6:48 pm on October 19th
Posted: 10:29 pm on October 17th
You must be logged in to post comments. Log in.