“His and Hers”
The Museum at FIT is currrently running “His and Hers,” an exhibit that explores the relationship between gender and fashion over the past 250 years. When I was young, I visited my grandmother often. She never wore pants. In fact, she didn’t own a pair of pants. She wore a “house” dress on most days, and felt that pants were for men. The gender definition of what should or shouldn’t be worn has changed many times over during the last 250 years, and often varies from region to region. This exhibit travels through the fashions during that period of time, noting the changes that occured.
Gender Similarities and Differences
While much of the exhibit discusses the changing ideas of “appropriate” attire for each gender, it also includes examples of so-called unisex and androgynous fashion. Side-by-side comparisons of men’s and women’s clothing highlight their differences—and similarities. More than 100 garments, accessories, and textiles from The Museum’s permanent collection are featured chronologically, from a seemingly “feminine” 18th-century man’s velvet suit, to a woman’s “power suit” from the 1980s. Other works include innovative designers such as Giorgio Armani, Jean-Paul Gaultier, Gianni Versace, and Vivienne Westwood.
Have you seen the exhibit?
If you are lucky enough to have the opportunity to visit this exhibit, please tell us about it. If you’re not able to, you can learn more by visiting the Museum’s website.
Somewhere I have a newspaper clipping that women were given the 'ok' to wear pants to work - in 1968! I used it as an example of the Women's Movement in my daughter's Girl Scout troop many years ago! This would be a fascinating exhibit to see. Thank you for showing us.
In 1971 or 1972 I was the first woman faculty member at the University of New Mexico to wear a pants suit to work. The campus photographer came and took photos of me. It was a suit I made. black and white stripes of different widths going around the body (I was much thinner then). Wide-legs and long vest.
I watched a program last night showing what women movie stars have worn on the "red carpet" almost since the beginning of the Oscars. During the '70's was the only time women wore pants.
I watched a program last night showing what women movie stars have worn on the "red carpet" almost since the beginning of the Oscars. During the '70's was the only time women wore pants.
I watched a program last night showing what women movie stars have worn on the "red carpet" almost since the beginning of the Oscars. During the '70's was the only time women wore pants.
Sorry that posted 3 times! My computer seems to be possessed.
Gender roles will never truly be liberated until a secure Alpha male, very much in the public eye, wears a skirt, dress, or equivalent to some important function. And I don’t mean something clichéd, sensational, suggestive, fetishistic, or overtly frilly or girlish either. It’s going to be much subtler and more mature than that, oozing with taste and confidence -- a breakthrough in cross-gender coherence such as only a celebrity would be permitted to achieve. It will split more than just the atom of fashion. It will be an epochal moment for all of us.
We live in Singapore for several months each year so I was able to see the Valentino exhibit which was recently on display here. I didn't count the number of gowns, but they advertised "!00 Gowns of Valentino." It was spectacular -- and the display hall could not have been more ideal if it had been built with the exhibit in mind. The gowns were in individual cases that allowed very close observation -- and they allowed people to take pictures! The fabric treatments and beading were beyond description. It was a memorable event!